EEOC Issues Employment Guidance on Coronavirus

The coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic has raised novel questions for employers and employees about what conduct is permissible by an employer who is covered under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended by the Rehabilitation Act. These laws provide important work-place protections to employees, including limitations on medical inquiries and examinations by an employer, protections for disabled employees, and an employee’s right to a reasonable accommodation under certain circumstances. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidance to employers clarifying the actions that employers may take with respect to the coronavirus/COVID-19 that are consistent with the principles of the ADA, as amended.

The EEOC guidance clarifies that the anti-discrimination rules under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act continue to apply to employers covered under those laws. However, the EEOC emphasized that these laws do not prevent employers from following local, state and federal public health authorities’ guidance on steps that employers should be taking with respect to coronavirus/COVID-19, guidance that is continuously evolving and with which employers should be up-to-date.  And, while employers have more flexibility regarding obtaining employees’ medical information, employers continue to be obligated to maintain confidential all information about the illness of an applicant or employee.

An important concept in the EEOC guidance to the current pandemic is that of a “direct threat,” which the ADA defines as  a significant risk of substantial harm to the health and safety of the individual or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation.”   The ADA does not protect an individual that poses a “direct threat” in the workplace. Based on the guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and other public health authorities, COVID-19 meets the standard for a “direct threat,” which allows employers to take certain actions that would otherwise be impermissible.

According to the EEOC guidance, it is permissible under the ADA as amended for employers to:

  • Screen job applicants for COVID-19 symptoms after making a conditional job offer, as long as the employer does so for all incoming employees in the same type of job.
  • Delay the start date of an applicant with a diagnosis or symptoms of COVID-19.
  • Withdraw a job offer to an applicant with a diagnosis or symptoms of COVID-19 when the employer needs the applicant to start immediately.
  • Measure the temperature of job applicants (post-offer and pre-employment) and of employees.  
  • Encourage employees to telework.
  • Require employees to adopt infection-control practices and wear personal protective equipment, with a reasonable accommodation where required for disability.
  • Ask employees who call in sick if they are experiencing symptoms of the virus.
  • Require employees sick with COVID-19 symptoms to stay home.
  • Require a doctor’s note certifying fitness for duty from an employee who was sick with COVID-19 symptoms. As a practical matter, new approaches to containing medical clearance may be necessary, since medical practitioners may be too busy to provide documentation.
  • Ask employees whether they are returning from specified locations, visitors to which the CDC or local public health officials have recommended to stay at home.
  • Obtain information from an employee who has visited  such specified locations, as recommended by the CDC and state/local public health authorities, in order to permit an employee’s return to the workplace.

While employers are allowed to take certain actions to protect the health and safety of their employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, the ADA still remains in effect.

Individuals who believe they are being unfairly discriminated against because they are disabled should contact Colleen M. Meenan at Meenan & Associates, LLC.

Call Us

Published by Colleen M. Meenan

Colleen Meenan is the founder of Meenan & Associates, a thriving general law practice cultivated through insightful legal strategies that she developed for businesses and individuals for over 28 years. Before practicing law, Colleen was a decorated New York City police officer. Colleen’s selfless sense of service and innate “street smarts” influence the firm’s core values, which include loyalty to the client’s best interests, personalized attention, and instinctive problem solving. Colleen is well-known for her uncompromising advocacy for work-place fairness for workers. Colleen has obtained a number of successful employment-related jury verdicts for her clients. Significant victories she has obtained for clients have been affirmed by the New York State Court of Appeals in the cases of Albunio v. City of New York, 16 N.Y.3d 472 (2011) and Sandiford v. City of New York, 22 N.Y. 3d 914 (2013). In her efforts to advance the rights of workers, Colleen testified before the New York City Council in December of 2015 in support of Int. 0814-2015, a proposed amendment to the City’s human rights law, requiring trial courts to correctly interpret the statute and recognize its broad and remedial purposes. This amendment was subsequently passed by the City Council, amending Administrative Code § 8-130 and affording workers the intended protections. Colleen currently serves on the Executive Board of the NYC Chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association, a membership organization of attorneys dedicated to advancing the rights of employees. Colleen can be reached at cmm@meenanesqs.com.

Leave a Reply

Call Us

Discover more from WORKER JUSTICE

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading